Sunday, May 19, 2013
The Tribune's Empty Immigration Argument
The Salt Lake Tribune recently published an editorial promoting amnesty ("Hatch leads the way"). If you are looking for reasons, backed up by evidence, for supporting amnesty, you are out of luck. There aren't any. It is an empty appeal.
We are told by the Tribune, for instance, that Senator Hatch knows how to read writing on walls, polls and letters from campaign contributors.
These remarkable abilities, developed over 36 years, apparently make Hatch a "savvy" politician. When this savvy is combined with his expertise on immigration, Hatch is also able to discern that now is the time for amnesty and we need to act before the current window of opportunity closes.
But this is not an argument for amnesty. It merely assumes that amnesty is good policy.
The key to Hatch's new realization:
"And now, Hatch says he sees what many others have seen. There are an estimated 11 million human beings who are living, working, going to school, buying things and paying taxes who continue to live lives completely or partially in the shadows. It would be neither humane nor practical to send them home, especially when a great many of them came here as children and truly have no home other than the U.S.A."
We are not told why it would not be humane to send them "home." We are not told why it would be impractical. Again, the editorial merely assumes the truth of these statements.
Any debate about exceptions should follow adequate border and interior enforcement - not grant amnesty now with empty promises for future enforcement.
Regarding the path to citizenship for illegal aliens and its proposed 13-year wait:
"Hatch rightly notes that such a long wait hardly gives anyone an unfair advantage over those who have entered, or sought to enter, the United States legally."
This incredible statement wants us to believe an absurdity: that someone who entered the nation illegally, not with the permission of the United States (but on his or her own whim) and has remained here for years, is the same situation as someone patiently waiting for years to enter the nation legally and is willing to abide by our laws even if it means they are never permitted to reside in the United States. One is here, the other is not. One is rewarded while one patiently waits. Are these equivalent?
Yes, Mr. Hatch, it does give illegal aliens an unfair advantage and invites others to do likewise.
There are other problems with this editorial.
The editorial ends by telling us that leading the way on immigration reform is right for Hatch. Embedded in this idea is the interesting notion that Hatch is providing "political cover" for other senators:
"Leading the way toward reform — and providing inspiration and political cover for other senators to follow — is something that is both the right thing for Hatch..."
Presumably, the earlier mentioned polls were telling Hatch that the public wants amnesty. Why do senators need "political cover" if this is true?
The actual situation is more in line with "writing on the walls" and letters from campaign contributors. In other words, special interests are pushing this bill, not public opinion, and they know it - thereby creating the need for the mental gymnastics on the part of the Tribune in this editorial and by other other amnesty promoters (such as Senator Hatch).
We should expect a lot of assumptions to be presented as established facts by the amnesty crowd and by their political spokesmen. It is the only way they can create enough confusion in the public to pass the Gang of Eight amnesty.